News

Senate Rejects Controversial Bill Extending Years Of Service For NASS Workers

Senate Rejects Controversial Bill Extending Years Of Service For NASS Workers
  • PublishedFebruary 23, 2024

The controversial bill seeking to extend the service year for employees of the National Assembly by additional five years has been rejected by the Senate.

Although, the bill has been passed at the House of Representatives, was declined for concurrence by the Senate on Thursday at plenary.

According to a report from the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), there were missed reactions amongst lawmakers in the Senate after the Senate Leader, Sen. Opeyemi Bamidele (APC-Ekiti), introduced the bill for concurrence.

While Sen. Sumaila Kawu (NNPP Kano) spoke in support of the bill, others, including Senators Enyinnaya Abaribe (APGA-Abia) and Ali Ndume (APC Borno), expressed reservations over the bill, saying that it would cause disaffection in the Nigerian civil service.

Speaking on why he opposed the bill,
Abaribe said there was no difference between a staff of National Assembly who has special knowledge as Director of Finance and a Director of Finance in Federal Ministry of Finance.

Abaribe said: “I have also looked at the retirement age for university lecturers and judicial officials, which we passed about the same time.

“And coming down to the officers of the National Assembly, I asked a simple question:

“What is the difference between the person who is a Finance Director in National Assembly and that in the Ministry of Finance?

“I do not see what separates the person who works inside here as a staff of the National Assembly from the person who works in the Ministry of Commerce as a staff member.

“We must not allow somebody to stay here beyond the rules of public service of Nigeria on retirement year.”

On his part, Ndume reiterated the contentious nature of the bill and urged the lawmakers to be careful in processing it.

The lawmaker urged his colleagues to repudiate the bill for further consultation.

Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, after his ruling, declared that the bill was repudiated because it was controversial.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *