Yahaya Bello Vs Dele Farotimi: The Tale Of Two Judicial Systems
The Nigerian justice system has again come under scrutiny following contrasting treatments meted out to two prominent figures embroiled in legal battles. Human rights activist and lawyer, Dele Farotimi, was on Monday paraded in handcuffs at the Federal High Court in Ado-Ekiti, sparking widespread outrage online.
Critics questioned why Farotimi, facing charges under the Cybercrimes Act for alleged defamation, was subjected to such visible restraint while former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello, accused of misappropriating over N100 billion, enjoys relative decorum in his court appearances.
Farotimi’s case, which stems from allegations of spreading false information about Afe Babalola SAN, highlights the selective application of justice in Nigeria.
Social media erupted with indignation, with many pointing out the stark contrast between Farotimi’s treatment and the dignity afforded to Bello during his ongoing trial for financial crimes. Human rights lawyer Inibehe Effiong succinctly captured the sentiment, asking, “Why is Dele Farotimi in handcuffs while Yahaya Bello, accused of siphoning billions, walks freely?”
On Monday, Justice Babs Olaniyi Kuewumi granted Farotimi a N50 million bail with stringent conditions, including a surety with two years’ tax clearance and a property of equal value.
Despite the court’s ruling, the image of Farotimi in handcuffs has fueled debates on whether the justice system unfairly targets activists and dissenters while shielding powerful political figures.
Meanwhile, Bello’s legal drama unfolds in Abuja, where he faces multiple charges of criminal breach of trust and money laundering totaling over N110 billion.
Despite the gravity of these allegations, the former governor has been spared the public humiliation of being paraded in handcuffs.
READ ALSO: Farotimi: How Obasanjo, Afe Babalola Allegedly Influenced A’Court Decision On Joshua Dariye
Bello’s high-profile trial before Justice Maryanne Anenih and Justice Emeka Nwite has raised questions about the anti-graft agency’s capacity to prosecute without fear or favor.
Observers argue that the treatment of Farotimi exemplifies a broader issue in Nigeria’s justice system: a tendency to suppress free speech while treating financial crimes with leniency.
“A man accused of defamation is humiliated in handcuffs, yet a former governor accused of embezzling billions is allowed to wave at supporters,” wrote Ettu Mohammad on Facebook.
In Bello’s case, critics accuse the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) of lacking the professionalism required to secure convictions in high-profile corruption cases.
Analysts highlight instances where the EFCC’s cases against politically exposed persons collapse due to poor preparation or strategic errors, leaving many to question the agency’s commitment to justice.
READ ALSO: Dele Farotimi Granted Bail
This disparity has led some to label the justice system as a tool for silencing dissent while protecting the powerful. Farotimi, known for his advocacy on free speech and good governance, finds himself at the center of a legal battle with far-reaching implications. On the other hand, Bello, shielded by his political network, continues to navigate his corruption trial with relative ease.
As Farotimi awaits his next court date on January 29, 2025, and Bello prepares for further legal proceedings, Nigerians are left to ponder the integrity of their judicial system. Is it a tool for justice or an instrument of oppression? The tale of these two figures underscores the urgent need for reforms that ensure equal treatment under the law.
For now, the contrasting images of a handcuffed activist and a smiling politician serve as a grim reminder of the inequalities that plague Nigeria’s legal landscape. The question remains: when will the scales of justice truly balance?
Sodiq Lawal is a passionate and dedicated journalist with a knack for uncovering captivating stories in the bustling metropolis of Osun State and Nigeria at large. He has a versatile reporting style, covering a wide range of topics, from politics , campus, and social issues to arts and culture, seeking impact in all facets of the society.
