Barcelona Must Change Its Flawed Transfer Policy

When one thinks about the best clubs in Europe, Barcelona, inevitably, is mentioned among the top three. It has prestige, along with a proven track record of winning every trophy over past decade. Whether under the guidance of Pep Guardiola, Tito Vilanova, or Luis Enrique, Barca always remained one of the most recognizable teams in world football. That trend is continuing this season with Ernesto Valverde at the helm.

However, the situation is far from perfect for the Catalan giants. Arch-rivals, Real Madrid has won three of last four Champions League titles. Not too long ago it was Barcelona ruling Europe, but things changed. The club must correct several ongoing issues to reclaim its position at top of ladder, notably the signing policy. Some recent Barca recruits have failed to perform as expected. In fact, several can be called flat-out disappointments.

One example is Andre Gomes. The Portugal international is among the most talented box-to-box midfielders in Europe, and his displays for the national team have been decent. He hasn’t replicated those performances playing for Las Blaugranas though. Gomes often looks tired, lazy and, at times, physically lightweight in both La Liga and the Champions League. Maybe he’s simply not on the same level as his Barca teammates, resulting in the midfielder looking like a worse player than he actually is.

Barcelona might sit top of both La Liga and UEFA Champions League standings, but serious issues affecting the club remain. One being its signing policy. Andre Gomes is a culprit in that regard.
Andre Gomes not the only disappointment, though…

In recent times, there are other cases which indicate that Barcelona hasn’t spent its money wisely. Thomas Vermaelen and Jeremy Mathieu never settled; both defenders spent more time off the pitch than on it. And Lucas Digne, former Paris Saint-Germain left-back, hasn’t provided strong competition to Jordi Alba.

Although it’s still early to analyse Paulinho and Nelson Semedo, as both joined Camp Nou during summer, the initial assessment isn’t positive. Semedo has played regularly but is outperformed by his teammate, Sergi Roberto – who isn’t even a natural fit at right-back – and Paulinho has been unable to compete with Sergio Busquets and Ivan Rakitic for a starting spot in central midfield.
Barcelona might sit top of both La Liga and UEFA Champions League standings, but serious issues affecting the club remain. One being its signing policy.

Additionally, Barcelona’s lack of activity in summer transfer window must be noted. After receiving over £200 million when Neymar jumped ship to join PSG, the hierarchy failed to adequately replace the Brazilian star. Los Cules couldn’t strike a deal to land any of their preferred targets -Philippe Coutinho and Paulo Dybala both rejected a move.

Gerard Deulofeu did rejoin, but his arrival was eclipsed by Ousmane Dembele’s £97 million transfer to Nou Camp. The French youngster looked like a decent signing, however, the former Dortmund star played only three games before getting injured. Sometimes bad luck plays a factor too.

The Catalan giants possess some of the world’s best footballers, but the team’s core won’t last forever. One thing is clear: the club must take action, quickly. Unless the transfer strategy is improved, Barcelona risks losing its long-established privileged position among Europe’s elite clubs.

 

Source: Its Round and Its White

What Is Driving Stunning Transfer Spending?

A record-breaking transfer window has seen the likes of Paris Saint-Germain, Manchester City and Barcelona spend hundreds of millions of euros so far on new players.

With all the major European leagues except Spain closing for business on Thursday, AFP Sport takes a look at how, and why, clubs are splashing such large amounts of cash.

Foreign investment
The close season’s two biggest spenders so far have been Manchester City, taken over by Abu Dhabi’s Sheikh Mansour in 2008, and Paris Saint-Germain, who have been the beneficiaries of Qatar’s billions, fronted by Nasser Al-Khelaifi, since 2011.

The exact worth of these two men is hard to calculate, as they come from wealthy royal families and are in essence representatives of their oil- and gas-rich countries.

But both have piled money into their respective clubs.

City has been one of Europe’s biggest spenders since stunning the Premier League with a 42-million-euro signing of Robinho on transfer deadline day in 2008, while PSG rocked the entire football world by paying a world record of 222 million euros ($264 million) to sign Neymar from Barcelona this summer.

The money does not just come from the Middle East though — Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich started the new breed of billionaire foreign owners when he bought Chelsea in 2003.

The Chinese are starting to take a slice of European football too. Businessman Li Yonghong took out a 300-million-euro loan to buy AC Milan, but was still able to spend 40 million euros on signing defender Leonardo Bonucci from Juventus in July.

Political statements
The most stunning move of the close season came when PSG paid Neymar’s release clause to prise the Brazilian playmaker away from Barcelona.

The move came after the start of a diplomatic crisis in June that saw countries including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Egypt cut off diplomatic relations with Qatar and impose trade and travel bans.

For Qatari Al-Khelaifi to spend 222 million euros on Neymar, plus a possible 180mn on Monaco youngster Kylian Mbappe, sent a “strong signal to the world of sport” and is a “challenge” to the UAE and Saudi Arabia, according to political analyst Andreas Krieg of King’s College London.

TV billions
The Premier League is football’s bastion when it comes to producing eye-popping figures, and its £5.14-billion (5.59 billion euros) TV rights deal has given English top-flight clubs extremely deep pockets.

The last deal was agreed in 2015, and saw Sky pay £4.2bn for five of seven TV packages, with BT Sports buying the other two.

That groundbreaking agreement was worth 71 percent more than the previous rights deal in 2012.

BT announced after the auction in 2015 that it would be paying £7.6 million for each live game.

TV rights for Spain’s La Liga went for a comparatively small three-year deal worth 2.65 billion euros, while rights for France’s Ligue 1 are worth 748.5 million euros a year.

The bumper deal for the Premier League has had two clear effects — clubs in other European leagues now know that they can hold out for much larger transfer fees when English sides bid for their players, while moves between Premier League teams are becoming more and more expensive.

Sponsorship soaring
It is not just TV rights pumping money into football clubs, but sponsorship deals.

Car manufacturer Chevrolet pay 67 million euros annually to have their logo given pride of place on Manchester United’s shirt, while Nike will pay Barcelona at least 150 million euros a year for the privilege of making their jerseys.

Earlier this month, Bayern Munich announced that they had agreed on a deal for Qatar’s Hamad International Airport to become their first-ever ‘sleeve sponsor’.

Deals of that nature hasten the globalization of football and indirectly push up transfer fees.

Marketing gold
Football players are becoming bigger stars than they were in the 20th century, partly because of the impact of the internet and social media on the accessibility of the big leagues around the world.

PSG president Al-Khelaifi claimed after signing Neymar that the Brazilian superstar would be worth 450 million euros “soon”.

Fans flocked to the PSG superstore on the Champs-Elysees in Paris the day after his signing to buy shirts with Neymar’s name on the back for up to 160 euros each.

Big clubs get bigger
Despite a new, more collective La Liga rights deal, Real Madrid and Barcelona still receive between 140 million to 150 million euros a year each.

The clubs that finish higher understandably win more prize money, meaning rich owners will pile cash into football’s giants, safe in the knowledge that plenty of it will be repaid.

Footballers union FIFPro claimed the current window showed how the sport has become “the domain of a select group of rich, mostly European-based clubs”.

But the fact is, Europe’s giants will continue to pour money into signing new players, as long as there are clear benefits.

Even when forgetting sponsorship deals and domestic TV rights, there is plenty of cash to be made, as shown by the fact UEFA paid more than 1.34 billion euros in prize money for the 2015-2016 Champions League.

 

 

 

Source: Super Sport